As Bruce Roberston Energy Finance Analyst, Gas/LNG for the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) reports in the last few weeks, we have seen a flurry of activity in the oil and gas industries.
Fracking companies in particular have been trying to respond to both the oil crash and the coronavirus crisis with a business-as-usual approach.
In the Northern Territory of Australia, where there a number of exploration projects, the government had previously been saying that oil and gas exploration should continue, despite the economic downturn and the implications of the coronavirus with worker-to-worker contact.
Two days ago, Origin called for an indefinite pause and exit from their fracking exploration operations in the Northern Territory’s Beetaloo basin.
They cited their reason due to the pandemic and an inability to quarantine, test and make workers stay apart.
IEEFA notes there is a more pressing reason that origin has made this call.
Globally renewables are overwhelming new builds of both fossil fuels and nuclear.
The gas industry has always said that conventional gas is a transition fuel.
However, globally new gas-fired power plant builds today are smaller now than they were in 2001.
If gas was truly a transition fuel, you would see gas dominating and coal disappearing.
The price of producing renewable energy globally has been continually falling, and it’s getting harder and harder for fossil fuels to compete.
In Australia, renewable energy already supplies 23 per cent of the National Electricity arket (NEM).
Globally, renewable energy is the cheapest source of power generation. Increasingly, it will be more so. It is a matter of time. In China, this will happen as soon as 2027.
In Australia it’s already the case. Wind and solar are already cheaper, even unsubsidised.
Inside the industry, gas executives see very little demand for their product beyond 30 years from now.
The proposed Burrup project in Western Australia has a 50-year life. The Northern Territory fracking projects have a minimum 30-year life, but for both, it’s unlikely they will see their 30-year life out.
Prior to COVID19, the gas industry saw increasing demand for their product, even if only within the 30-year projected life span.
It will take a long while for all of us to crawl out of the economic effects this virus will heave. It will last for years.
Then there is another issue: there’s an oversupply of gas.
The global gas glut will not resolve now until about 2030.
It was previously projected to resolve by 2025. So why would any gas company look to build new gas now?
The largest cost of renewable energy is the financing.
Running a solar plant, for instance, costs very little. In our current climate, financing costs are declining for renewables as interest rates fall, while financing costs for fossil fuels are going up.
This is because the debt markets have lost patience. They are downgrading the debt of oil and gas companies.
Currently, the United States fracking industry is experiencing a flood of bankruptcies, and soon, some US$86 billion dollars of debt will be due.
This will be very difficult for the industry to manage.
When enough fracking companies go broke in the US, this will force prices back up, at which point gas will become uneconomic to produce.
Whether prices are low or high, it is not good for the fracking industry.
Too low and they can’t make money, and too high and they lose market share to renewables.
Origin’s Kyalla fracking project in the Northern Territory’s Beetaloo Basin was pulled this week.
It is not, however, just the virus that is stopping them.
Origin, via a consortium, have already invested $25 billion at Gladstone LNG plants in Queensland.
It needs more gas to put through these plants. If they stop supplying those plants, they go bankrupt.
The gas industry has been given a free ride to continue for some years now, but they are pulling out because they don’t have the money to continue.
In fact, they are pulling out globally.
They simply cannot make money when oil is below US$35/barrel.
Even if oil prices recover a little, fracking companies will still be below their break-even prices. Simply, they cannot fund their projects at the moment.
At a time when globally oil and gas companies are cutting projects and shrinking their ambitions, some large renewable projects, on a globally significant scale, are forging ahead.
ACCIONA have just announced a new 1026-megawatt (MW) wind farm in Queensland.
The project will begin construction in mid-2021 and will require a total investment of $1.96 billion over three years.
The MacIntyre complex will be ACCIONA’s biggest renewable energy facility and one of the largest onshore wind farms in the world.
While ACCIONA have been investing large capital in new projects, Woodside has deferred a final investment decision on the major elements of its Burrup Hub expansion project as weak global LNG prices takes its toll.
Origin have previously said the Beetaloo Basin is liquid rich, which means they can see oil.
This oil wasn’t discussed in the Pepper fracking enquiry, which is dishonest because they know it is there, but even with oil and gas underground, Origin cannot afford to continue.
For Origin to receive any return from their LNG export business APLNG, they need oil to be higher than US$36/barrel.
They will struggle this year to receive any return. They may need to prop up their failing investment with new equity.
And Santos were looking at developing the Barossa gas field offshore in the Northern Territory.
That project has now been put on ice. Santos sold a 25 per cent interest in Darwin LNG and the Bayu Undan offshore gas field to SK E&S for US$390m, contingent on the Barossa field getting the final investment decision.
In the current climate, it could be that the Darwin LNG and Bayu Undan sale falls through.
Similar to the US experience, fracking in Australia has been a financial disaster.
It is a massive loss-making industry.
Santos has written off nearly US$7 billion over the last five years, and if you include Origin’s losses, this rises to over US$10 billion.
This is before the impact of the coronavirus.
We will see further large write-offs from these companies. It will seriously strain them and their ability to raise debt or equity.
The gas industry has also been lying about their emissions, to the tune of 25-40 per cent.
Gas emissions are 50 per cent less than burning coal IF the gas is just used to produce electricity in a gas baseload plant.
But in Australia, we use gas in gas peaking plants which are far less efficient.
In those plants, gas is only 31 per cent more efficient than coal.
Australia also exports its gas.
Making liquefied natural gas (LNG) uses an awful lot of gas and electricity.
The LNG process involves burning an extra 17 per cent of gas.
In addition, if we look at fugitive emissions along the supply chain, even more methane is released.
We only need about two to three per cent of fugitive emissions to make gas worse than coal.
Which means, gas is a high emitting fuel that needs to be recognised as such in order to reduce global emissions in line with the United Nations sponsored Paris Agreement.
Gas usage for power in Australia has declined by 59 per cent since 2014.
Gas is not a transition fuel. The decline has occurred while renewable energy capacity has increased.
Further, there is no committed investment into gas powered generation in Australia, and at this stage, it could only occur with bloated subsidies.
The Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) sees a smaller role for gas into the future.
They have developed an Integrated System Plan (ISP) which states that under current policy conditions, without any changes, they see a decline in gas usage in Australia to 2042.
Instead, the vast majority of proposed projects in Australia are in solar, wind, hydro and batteries.
In addition to living in a dream, the gas industry is a poor tax and royalty payer.
The Australian government budget will be under enormous pressure over the next 12 months, and it will need to find more money.
The gas industry has been a very poor contributor in terms of tax and royalties.
The Ichthys project for instance will export $190 billion of oil and gas products over its 60-year life providing no royalties to the Australian people.
Despite the LNG boom, the government’s Petroleum Resources Rent Tax (PRRT) take from the industry is set to fall $450m over the four-year budget estimates, from $1.4bn annually today.
There is no other industry where revenues rise dramatically and royalty income falls.
That the Federal and various state and territory governments allowed our resources to be given to an industry with barely any recompense is beyond comprehension.
In these troubled times, where government budgets are stretched to breaking point, reform of the gas royalty system is an obvious source of revenue.
Gas has a very uncertain future.
Some gas players have seen the light and are investing in renewable energy.
If Australia had some modest policy to encourage companies to go that way, like a carbon tax or a tax on pollution, things would be changing very quickly.
There are proposals for the Northern Territory to be the solar plant for Asia.
Renewable energy is a far more concrete way forward than pursuing gas, which is an outdated vision of the future.
EcoNews is an independent publication that relies on contributions from its readers.
WE’RE BUILDING A PLATFORM WITH A CLEAR FOCUS ON THE ENVIRONMENT, CULTURAL AND SOCIAL GOOD. CONTRIBUTE AND TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE AN IMPACT.
If you value EcoNews, but are unable to contribute via sponsorship or advertising we ask that you promote our online store The Native Shop – www.nativeshop.com.au via your social media to assist us to fund this valuable service.
