According to a university analysis of current policies of the conservative Liberal-National government up to 11,000 renewable energy workers are expected to lose their jobs over the next two years.
If correct, the loss of jobs would be equivalent to the abolition of Australia’s domestic-focused coal industry, which employs a little more than 10,000 people in mining thermal coal for local use and running Australia’s coal-fired power plants.
Guardian Australia reports that described as the first large-scale survey of renewable energy jobs in Australia, the research from the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) found the industry would be a major source of jobs in the medium term, but its short-term future would depend on how COVID-19 stimulus packages were deployed.
About 26,000 people are employed in renewable energy, but the study found this would fall to about 15,000 by 2022 under existing policies, including the Liberal-National government not replacing the national renewable energy target.
The target, which required energy companies to source about 23 per cent of electricity from clean sources, was reached last year, triggering a 50 per cent drop in large-scale renewable energy investment compared with 2018.
Conversely, renewable energy jobs would be expected to reach about 45,000 by 2025 under a “step change” scenario, set out by the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO), consistent with the goals of the United Nations sponsored 2015 Paris Agreement.
Guardian Australia reports the study said on this path employment in renewable energy would be likely to fall to about 30,000 as construction eased later this decade before rising again after 2030.
Dr Chris Briggs, a research principal at the UTS Institute for Sustainable Futures, said up to two-thirds of renewable energy jobs would be expected to be created in regional areas.
“It’s a difference of 30,000 jobs in the next few years depending on government policy,” he said.
Many of the jobs would be expected to be in identified renewable energy zones.
The zones overlap with existing coal regions but are more widespread.
Dr Briggs said it suggested renewable energy could play a meaningful role alongside other industries in creating replacement jobs in coal regions as the world reduced reliance on fossil fuels, but only if the transition was well planned and funded.
Coal mining employs about 40,000 Australians, mostly for exporting companies.
“If we wait until south-east Asia stops using our coal things are going to be pretty dire,” Dr Briggs said.
The study estimates the number of renewable energy jobs in solar, wind, hydro and batteries.
It does not include related jobs in building transmission infrastructure, or new fields they may develop such as renewable hydrogen.
Business groups, the energy industry, trade unions and major investors are among those to have called for post-COVID stimulus spending to be designed to also address the climate crisis.
The Liberal-National government has backed a “gas-fired recovery” from the pandemic, and has not prioritised climate-friendly policies as part of its response.
Guardian Australia reports that on Wednesday, the Liberal-National New South Wales state government released a statement on coal exploration and mining that said the industry would generate regional jobs and royalties to pay for public services and infrastructure for decades to come.
The NSW government coal statement appears to assume the world will not meet the climate goals agreed in Paris five years ago.
It suggests demand for thermal coal, which is burned in power stations, will fall by only about 10 per cent over the next 30 years.
It expects coal use for electricity to roughly double in both south-east Asia and the Indian Ocean region by 2050.
Tim Buckley, from the Institute of Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, said this assumed a world of catastrophic climate change, and was at odds with the global push by banks and institutional investors worth trillions of dollars for the world to move away from thermal coal, leading to commitments to exit coal by several major producers.
Mr Buckley gave the example of the Indian government, which had repeatedly said it wanted to end the country’s reliance on thermal coal imports by 2023-24 as it expanded local coalmining and renewable energy.
The International Energy Agency, which has been criticised for underestimating the rise of renewable energy, has modelled two scenarios of future thermal coal use, one roughly similar to that adopted by the NSW government, the other vastly different.
Under its “stated policies scenario”, coal demand stays flat until 2040.
Under its “sustainable development scenario”, the amount of coal burned would be cut by more than half over the next 20 years.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found limiting global heating to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels was likely to require coal power being cut by between 59 per cent and 78 per cent below 2010 levels by 2030, and for greenhouse gas emissions to reach net zero by 2050.
The UTS research, which formed the basis of a briefing paper by the Clean Energy Council earlier this month, was presented at a University of Melbourne seminar today.
EcoNews is an independent publication that relies on contributions from its readers.
WE’RE BUILDING A PLATFORM WITH A CLEAR FOCUS ON THE ENVIRONMENT, CULTURAL AND SOCIAL GOOD. CONTRIBUTE AND TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE AN IMPACT.
If you value EcoNews, but are unable to contribute via sponsorship or advertising we ask that you promote our online store The Native Shop – www.nativeshop.com.au via your social media to assist us to fund this valuable service.
One Response
Yes our stupid coal criminal corrupt government only has their own and the fossil fuel interests and their own pockets being their only policy at peril of our economy and the planet. When will these criminals be locked up?