Suzuki labels Lib-Nat govt environmental ‘barbarians’

In a hard-hitting speech, Canadian environmentalist Dr David Suzuki has criticised Australia’s new conservative Liberal-National government’s policy on climate change and exhorted Australians to embrace renewable energy.

Dr Suzuki was delivering the 2013 UNSW Jack Beale Lecture on the Global Environment to a packed audience at the institution in the New South Wales capital, Sydney, on the topic: Imagining a sustainable future, foresight over hindsight.

Suzuki-David-speech-UNSWHowever, Dr Suzuki said the actions of the newly-elected federal government had led him to consider changing his talk’s title to “The Barbarians have Breached the Gates.”

Putting a price on carbon was by far the most effective way to get corporations and individuals to reduce their carbon footprint, he said.

By moving to eliminate the carbon price, the Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, would make this a “politically toxic” issue in Australia for at least a decade.

“And this, of course, is just what corporations have wanted,” Dr Suzuki said.

He gave the example of Sweden as a country that has seen its economy grow strongly and greenhouse gas emissions fall sharply following the introduction of a price on carbon.

Tim-flannery-chief-climate-commissionerDr Suzuki also criticised the new government’s decision to shut down the Climate Commission, an independent source of information on climate change.

In Canada, those in power could be sued for “wilful blindness” if they suppressed or ignored vital information, he said.

“That is what Mr Abbott is doing by cancelling the commission, by firing Professor Tim Flannery, its chief commissioner.

Fiji-climate-change-flooding“It is criminal negligence through wilful blindness,” he said.

He also blasted “outrageously rich people”, including billionaire Australian businesswoman, Gina Rinehart, for helping fund a “campaign of confusion” about the science of climate change.

Many climate sceptics were funded by the fossil fuel industry, he said: “Follow the money and then ask: How credible are they?”

Dr Suzuki said the environmental movement had achieved enormous successes in the 1960s and ‘70s, but many of the battles fought then, such as stopping dam constructions or the drilling for oil in reserves, were back on the agenda.

heatwave-sky-weather“Environmentalism is a way of seeing our place within the biosphere. That’s what the battles were fought over.

The barbarians, that is, many of the politicians and corporate executives that environmentalists have been fighting all these years, are driven by a totally different set of values, by the drive for profit, for growth and for power,” he said.

Australians had abundant sunlight and should use this “energy source of the future” to replace coal.

climate-report-heatwave-Sydney-bushfireWith extreme bushfires, loss of half the coral cover of the Great Barrier Reef, and prolonged droughts, Australians should also be “at the ramparts” drawing the world’s attention to environmental problems.

“Mother Earth is giving you the signals in Australia, loud and clear,” Dr Suzuki said.

He said he still held out hope, however, that it was not too late to change the course of events.

“I believe that if we give nature a chance, nature will be far more forgiving than we deserve,” he said before receiving a standing ovation.

Share it :

2 Responses

  1. Perhaps if there was a leader ship challenge Malcolm would win as at least he supports carbon trading and seems to have some intelligence and is not just about himself. Just let the rabbit dig his hole.
    This current government is about foreign business not Australia or its land and people. The sooner it is sacked the better.

  2. I don’t think David takes adequate account of the inaction by the previous Government’s network. I don’t think the market is close enough to what is happening on the ground when it comes to improving energy efficiency and better business. Corporations are able to redirect the cost of change, if and when it happens, onto consumers in our consumer society.
    Whatever you may think about climate, to me there is little doubt that the elaborate and confusing climate bureaucracy Labor had established with considerable overlap there was continuing capacity to handball responsibility. We had at various times the Climate Change Authority, the Climate Commission the Department of Environment, the Renewable Energy Regulator and Clean Energy Finance Corporation. Then there is the EPA system in every state. The later costing us about a $million a week.
    EPAs are meant to be regulating pollution emissions for the benefit of our environment and well being, but is in fact not making any independent local assessment. Licensed companies provide their own license conditions and emission measures. Regulation that is doing nothing, when there could be assistance and confirmation of greater efficiency and better business practice.
    I point to EcoMapping in EU and California. Engaging and welcoming staff on work sites to contribute more effective business process and production. It has lots of positives. The sum of those will be about a better bottom line for business, customers and the world’s atmosphere.
    We can follow a similar process at home and our surrounding neighbourhood; optimising efficiency and effectiveness in our living and environmental design to reduce maintenance improve local ecosystems.
    EcoMapping is a practical way to engage the quality of our local living and working environments; How Do I Make an EcoMap? http://www.ask.com/question/how-do-i-make-an-ecomap Articles and interviews; http://www.unesco-apnieve.edu.au/APNIEVE_Articles
    EcoMapping is a digital guide to recognising the potential benefit of introducing an audit process to discover where things are up to, and to improve quality and efficiency, and reduce waste
    Over 40 countries have it now as part of the way they work to improve both environmental and business performance. It is a practical solution to issues that are not always at the top of business priority, particularly those businesses that are long established and have political sway. EcoMapping has the potential to halve greenhouse gases within 2 years, not 10, and not when the market feels like it.
    The key advisory institutions just sacked gave no attention to better process and ignored process changes in other parts of the world. Why?