New Australian research suggests China will have introduced a nationwide Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) and a carbon tax by the end of this decade.
A team from the Australian National University surveyed nearly 100 China-based carbon pricing experts about the likelihood of the world’s biggest emitter implementing an economy-wide scheme.
AAP Newsagency reports the inaugural China Carbon Pricing Survey, the first of its kind, found there was “strong confidence” that China would proceed to a national ETS in a bid to drive down its emissions.
The survey was released as the OECD urged world governments to put a price on carbon, arguing a carbon tax or ETS should be at the cornerstone of all global efforts to tackle climate change.
ANU associate professor Frank Jotzo said it would be very significant if China, the world’s second largest economy, made the shift to a market-based scheme.
“I think it sends a strong signal to any country that does not use price-based emissions mechanisms that it may be a good idea to reconsider,” he told AAP.
“If we have China so strongly expected to take on these cost-effective mechanisms, it makes all the more sense to use them in a market economy such as Australia.”
Australia’s new conservative Liberal-National coalition government has vowed to repeal the country’s carbon pricing laws, and hopes to have the scheme abolished entirely by July 2014.
After OECD head Angel Gurria this week called on world leaders to explore “all avenues to price carbon”, environment groups in Australia urged the government to reconsider its position.
Federal Environment Minister Greg Hunt argues domestic emissions have climbed under the carbon price, and has vowed to introduce legislation to abolish the scheme in the first sitting week of the new parliament.
“We do not agree that a carbon tax is an effective way to reduce emissions,” he told AAP in a statement.
China is in the process of launching seven pilot ETS, which will cover 250 million people and one-fifth of their entire economy by 2015.
Professor Jotzo said the Chinese leadership understood climate change was a threat to its future, and was keen to address public concerns about the air pollution choking some of its major cities.
Professor Jotzo, director of the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy at the ANU, said while the survey was by its nature not representative, it was the first time researchers could put numbers to the action those with close knowledge of the situation thought China would take on carbon.
China had already taken steps to slash its coal consumption, and was expected to exceed its goal of reducing the intensity of CO2 emissions within its economy by 45 per cent by 2020.
He said if China put a price on carbon it would have significant implications for Australian exports, particularly coal.
P
rofessor Jotzo said it would be ironic if China, with its tradition of heavy-handed control of industry, moved to an ETS while free-market economies like Australia opted for more direct government involvement.
“Emissions trading is increasingly seen as an important part of the policy mix in China, because it’s seen as more cost effective,” Professor Jotzo said.
The ANU survey, conducted with Beijing-based NGO China Carbon Forum, found a Chinese carbon price would likely be $12 a tonne in 2020, rising sharply thereafter.






3 Responses
Well there you are!!! With neo con retards like Abbott and Hunt leading the way and Clive Palmer with a direct vested interest in ignoring the damage from carbon we are headed for pariah state status-and an inevitable carbon withdrawal recession for which we will now be totally unprepared.We will be penalised by those trading partners with carbon pricing in the interest of fairness in trading.One problem-they will keep the revenue!!!! We deserve it-another recession we have to have!
LOL are you people that gullible. What happened in January 2012 when papers reported, and I quote;
“CHINA is planning a carbon tax on big energy consumers by 2015 in a development that has been seized on by the Gillard government as further evidence the rest of the world is acting to cut global greenhouse emissions. ”
Next year it will be 2030, then 2050, when they actually do it, let me know.
Google is your friend to avoid looking foolish.
Abbott a neo-con?
Well Julia Gilliard did a great job as our resident neo-con continuing our involvement in all US Wars of aggression.
Name one left leaning humanitarian thing she or Rudd did?
(besides saying sorry to the Indigenous people….)